Legal Opinion

The Eloina

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided May 15, 1879No. Case No. 4,420PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENEDICT, District Judge.

This collision was caused by the neglect of the master of the Eloina to put out a second anchor. The circumstances plainly required that precaution, and were sufficient to notify an intelligent master that such a precaution could not be omitted without danger of drifting and consequent collision with the libellant’s vés-sel then anchored astern. The act of the master, in directing the second anchor to be got ready to let go immediately and he be called at once’in case the vessel should begin to drag, shows knowledge of the danger. The master with such knowledge took…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sherborne v. The N. & W. No. 4District Court, S.D. New York · 1893
  2. Marcussen v. The Mary FraserDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1886
  3. The CometDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API