Legal Opinion

Bartone v. Mahr

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 3, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

The plaintiff Bartone sustained rather moderate personal injuries, and the automobile of the coplaintiff was damaged, when on February 25, 1957, it was in collision on Airport Road in Hartford with a forty-three-foot tractor-trailer truck owned by the defendant. From a judgment for the plaintiffs the defendant has appealed. The court concluded that the truck driver was negligent, that his negligence was the proximate cause of the *188collision, and that Bartone was not contributorily negligent. Mainly, the appeal is limited to those issues of liability.

The defendant is not entitled to any…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Essam v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  2. Peichert v. JanuarySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marcio v. Helm's Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API