Legal Opinion

Musgrove v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 6, 1988No. BR-331PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal of a sentence more lengthy than the presumptive sentence under the sentencing guidelines, the appellant contends, first, that the reasons given by the trial court for imposing a departure sentence were not clear and convincing and, second, that the extent of the departure sentence imposed is excessive. We agree with appellant’s first contention, and thus need not reach the second. We reverse and remand.

The trial court’s written statement of reasons for departure provides:

The Defendant has a substantial juvenile record involving theft and burglary offenses which are not scored…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Keys v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  4. Weems v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  5. Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morgan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Blue v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Crocker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API