Legal Opinion

(HC)Redmond v. Tampkins

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 13, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01511Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CESARE REDMOND, No. 2:19-cv-1511 JAM AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 C. TAMPKINS, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, ECF No. 1, and an application to proceed in forma pauperis, 19 ECF No. 6. 20 I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 21 Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford 22 the costs of suit.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Lewis v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API