Legal Opinion

Whistle Bottling Co. v. Searson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 27, 1922No. 6 Div. 627PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This is a damage suit by E. A. Searson against the Whistle Bottling Company. The defendant was in the business of manufacturing and placing' on the market in bottles a soft drink called “Whistle” for the public. A friend of plaintiff purchased from a retailer two bottles of Whistle, and gave one to plaintiff. It contained a bug called “thousand legs.” Blaintiff was made sick, nadseated, and caused to suffer pain and mental anguish from drinking a portion of the contents of the bottle. There was judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.

There are two counts in the complaint. Count 1…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. R. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. McPherson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Travis v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Thornton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  5. Birmingham Chero-Cola Bottling Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. McGuff v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Hancock v. Paccar, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Fincher v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Nerud v. Haybuster Manufacturing, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Dennis v. PrisockMississippi Supreme Court · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API