Legal Opinion
Han v. Financial Supervisory Service
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 3, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2018-0141Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KAREN C. HAN, Plaintiff, v. Civ. Action No. 18-141 FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY SERVICE, (EGS) Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER I. Introduction Ms. Karen C. Han (“Ms. Han” or “Plaintiff”), who proceeds pro se, brought this action against Financial Supervisory Service (“FSS” or “Defendant”), alleging that FSS interfered in the contractual relationship between her now-defunct financial services company, Peninsula Asset Management Ltd. (“Peninsula”), and Hankook Tire Company, Ltd. (“Hankook”). See generally Compl., ECF No. 1. 1 On July 5,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.