Legal Opinion

United States v. Louisiana

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided October 30, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 80-3300PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*608ORDER

CHARLES SCHWARTZ, Jr., District Judge.

Notwithstanding factual distinctions between Louisiana’s and Mississippi’s public higher education systems, see, e.g., United States v. Louisiana, 692 F.Supp. 642, 656 n. 69 (E.D.La.1988), and respectfully disagreeing with the majority’s conclusion in Ayers v. Allain, 914 F.2d 676 (5th Cir.1990) (en banc), this Court nonetheless finds that Ayers is both binding and controlling in this cause and that, under Ayers, there are no disputed material facts left for this Court to resolve.1 Accordingly, the Court VACATES its Order of August 2, 1988,2 692…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Quincy Lairsey and Frances Lairsey v. The Advance Abrasives CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Ayers v. AllainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. LouisianaDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1988
  4. United States v. State of La.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. State of La.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API