Bonneluco v. Bernard
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
This matter is now before us on motion of defendant-appellee to dismiss both the suspensive and the devolutive appeals taken by plaintiff-appellant.
Plaintiff claims of defendant $285 with interest and attorney's fees, alleging that she and her husband, who is now dead, were former tenants of defendant, occupying a portion of a residence owned by him at an agreed rental charge of $45 per month; that shortly after the death of her husband, the rent was reduced to $35 per month; that the said defendant, Bernard, did not comply with the requirements of the "Price Control Law requiring the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Saint v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Succession of LissaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Haas v. BuckSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- Succession of WolfeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Messina v. CageLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bolden v. City of ShreveportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Bencaz v. BeckendorfLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
- Bonnelucq v. BernardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949