Legal Opinion
Solano v. Beilby
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 24, 1985No. 83-5591PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Joseph Solano and Michael Urlevich, both longshoremen, brought an admiralty action in the Central District of California under 28 U.S.C. § 1338 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(h) against California United Terminals for negligence resulting in personal injuries. The district court, finding that there was no duty of care owed to plaintiffs, ruled in favor of the defendant terminal operator in a summary judgment. Solano and Urlevich filed a timely appeal raising the following issues for our review: 1) whether California United had actual, constructive, or inquiry notice of the dangerous…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scindia Steam Navigation Co. v. De Los SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Foremost Insurance v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Leather's Best, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. S.S. Mormaclynx, Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. ImbrovekSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Worldwide Church of God v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Debbie Fiester, an Individual v. Allan TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- MacKAY v. PFEILCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Paul Guidry v. John DurkinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Taghadomi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.