Legal Opinion

Hammer v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 16, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIRD, Judge.

William Hammer is charged with stealing motors and other boating equipment. Bethel Hammer, brother of the defendant, owned a houseboat on which he had permitted the owners to store the equipment. It was from this boat that the property was taken.

William Hammer was indicted, tried and convicted on a charge of grand larceny. He appeals.

He first complains that his rights were prejudiced because one of the owners, a prosecuting witness, was foreman of the indicting grand jury. There is no merit in this contention. Section 104 of the Criminal Code of Practice provides as follows :

“If a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  2. Hedger v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  3. Bates v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Partin v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Partin v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API