Legal Opinion · Dissent

Boarman v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2001No. 1999-SC-0233-DGPublished

1DissentStumbo, Justice

Respectfully, I must dissent.

I join the majority in their holding that the life insurance in this case should not be offset from Appellant’s recovery. I would go further, however, and also prevent the Cabinet from offsetting the medical expenses and the basic reparation benefits.

MEDICAL EXPENSES

As personal representative of Danny’s estate, Lora had a choice to bring either a wrongful death action, against the Cabinet, a personal injury action against the Cabinet, or both. She brought only a wrongful death action. In a wrongful death action, the damages recoverable are funeral expenses and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Transportation Cabinet, Bureau of Highways v. RoofKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Luttrell v. WoodKentucky Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API