Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Reyna

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1996No. 95-1123PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a personal injury action. Petitioner, Sandra Peterson, appeals from the court of appeals’ judgment affirming the trial court’s judgment in her favor. We grant writ of error and modify the court of appeals’ judgment to delete the assessment of costs against petitioner. Because the petitioner satisfied the requirements set out in Tex. R.App.P. 40(a)(3) to prosecute the appeal as an indigent, all parties agree that the court of appeals erred in its assessment of costs against her. As to the remainder of the court of appeals’ judgment, for which there is no opinion of the court because…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Reyna, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
  2. Ransom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ransom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Albert Lee Giddens v. Jarrett Huffman, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  3. H.E. Butt Grocery Company, Inc., (APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE) v. RenCare, Ltd., (APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT), Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
  4. In Re Sosa, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  5. In Re Sosa, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API