Legal Opinion

The Chicago

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided August 12, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Admiralty. Suits for personal injuries. Application for decree ■on report of commissioner.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

The issues in the above-entitled cases were referred by me, pursuant to stipulation of the parties, to Hon. George Clinton, under admiralty rule 44, to hear, try, and determine, and render his decision, with an opinion, to this court. The report of the commissioner is that the primary cause of the injury to libelants was the use by the steam vessel Chicago of too brittle cast-iron hinges, which were attached to the hatch combings, and upon which were suspended skids weighing about one-half a ton. He further reported that such hinges were of such low resistance to strains…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coughlin v. The RheolaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884
  2. Jensen v. The Joseph B. ThomasDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1897
  3. Frederick Leyland & Co. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1907
  4. Providence Washington Ins. v. The SydneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1886
  5. The Allison WhiteDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. St. Joe Boom Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Grays Harbor Stevedore Co. v. FountainCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  3. Mitchell v. EtnaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Fill v. Cunard S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1914
  5. Greco v. Det Bergenske DampskibsselskabDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API