Legal Opinion

City of Akron v. Smith

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1968No. 68-48PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The question in this case, whether prosecution for the commission of the offense made punishable by the municipal ordinance is limited by the state statute, is

*249answered in the affirmative by authority of the holding of this court in paragraphs one and two of the syllabus in State, ex rel. Ramey, v. Davis, 119 Ohio St. 596, which state:

‘ ‘ 1. The sovereignty of the state in respect to its courts extends over all the state, including municipalities, whether governed by charter or general laws.

“2. None of the various provisions of Article XVIII of the Constitution of Ohio are effective to abridge…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Ramey v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Cincinnati v. Thomas Soft Ice Cream, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. City of Akron v. AkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. City of Cincinnati v. DegoyerHamilton County Municipal Court · 1968
  4. Smith v. BodleOhio Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API