Legal Opinion

Conway v. Conway

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint in this and three other actions brought by same plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

This is one of four actions brought by the plaintiff to recover back moneys lost at gaming by the defendant Peter Conway. The parties defendant are not the same in each action, nor are the facts, but the same question of law is presented in each and the disposition of that question is necessarily decisive of all four actions.

The facts which by reason of defendants’ demurrer stand admitted, briefly stated, are as follows : The defendant Peter Conway was the agent of the plaintiff and as such sold certain articles of produce belonging to his principal. Instead of turning over the avails to her,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Meech v. . StonerNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Barker v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1822
  4. Buel v. BoughtonNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  5. Colville v. BeslyNew York Supreme Court · 1846

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heitfeld v. Benevolent & Protective Order of KeglersWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Ervin v. State ex rel. WalleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API