Legal Opinion

Stephen Sprinkle v. Carolyn Colvin

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 23, 2015No. 13-3654PublishedCited by 228 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

Stephen Sprinkle, a social security disability claimant, sought an award of attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (the “EAJA”). While the EAJA contains a presumptive rate cap of $125 an hour, courts may award enhanced fees where they are justified because of an increase in the cost of living. The district court found that Sprinkle was entitled to EAJA fees, but rejected his request for a cost-of-living enhancement on the ground that he failed to meet the stringent and difficult burden set out in Mathews-Sheets v. Astrue, 653 F.3d 560 (7th Cir.2011).…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Johnson v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by228 opinions

  1. Harrington v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Jensen v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2018
  3. Coursey v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  4. Parrott v. ShulkinCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  5. ADDY v. KIJAKAZIDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2022

223 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API