Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

David Pitts Jr. and Kenyetta Gurley v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Company and Rhoda Renee Jones, M.D.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 2017No. 2016-C-1232Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWeimer, J.

11While I concur in that portion of the majority opinion that affirms the court of appeal’s ruling reversing the district court’s grant of a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (“JNOV”), I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting a conditional new trial. Finding, on the basis of the differing opinions expressed by the medical experts, that the jury’s verdict was supportable by any fair interpretation of the evidence, I would reverse the district court’s grant of a conditional new trial and affirm the judgment of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Samaha v. RauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  2. Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  3. Gibson v. Bossier City General Hosp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Martin v. Heritage Manor SouthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  5. David Pitts Jr. and Kenyetta Gurley v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Company and Rhoda Renee Jones, M.D.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API