Legal Opinion

Knoth v. Barclay

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1885PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Petition for a rehearing.

1Per curiam

Each and every matter presented upon this rehearing save one was fully and carefully examined in preparing the opinion heretofore filed. We are still satisfied with the correctness of the views therein expressed, and deem any further argument thereof unnecessary.

*306The question which was not then considered relates to the sufficiency of the bill of exceptions. Counsel now for the first time urge the proposition that the bill does, not “purport to contain all the evidence,” and therefore the sufficiency of the proofs could not be inquired into. We do not feel called upon to determine whether or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Parks v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Copper Queen Mining Co. v. Arizona Prince Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Merchants' National Bank v. GreenhoodMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Nesbit v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  4. Sweigle v. GatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Weil v. NevittSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API