Legal Opinion

Bertha Mineral Co. v. Simpson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 15, 1922No. 3193PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.

1. “ Possession of land under a claim of ownership being prima facie evidence of title in the occupant, the latter, upon proof of such possession, and without showing complete title, may maintain against a wrong-doer an action for a trespass upon the property, com-

mitted while such possession existed.” Tolbert v. City of Rome, 134 Ga. 136 (67 S. E. 540).

2. Error is assigned upon the following charge of the court: “In other words, gentlemen, at the time the Bertha Mineral Company cut the timber, if you find that they did cut it, in order for the plaintiff to be entitled to recover, he must…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tolbert v. City of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Seal v. AldredgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  3. Mitchell v. BaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  4. Seal v. AldredgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API