Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Nelson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 13, 1991No. 1901453Published

1Opinion of the Court

595 So.2d 510 (1991)

Ex parte Joseph Langston NELSON.

(Re Joseph Langston Nelson v. State).

1901453.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

December 13, 1991.

Eddie Beason of Fine & McDowell, Russellville, for petitioner.

James H. Evans, Atty. Gen., and Yvonne A. Henderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

KENNEDY, Justice.

In Alabama, when a witness takes the stand and swears to tell the truth and then testifies, there is no legal presumption that he or she testifies truthfully. Such an instruction to a jury would constitute error.

The petitioner, Joseph Langston Nelson, was indicted for the offense of attempted…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Ex Parte FrazierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  5. Foster v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API