Legal Opinion
L.A.M. Recovery, Inc. v. Department of Consumer Affairs
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 5, 2006No. 05-4538PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
L.A.M. Recovery, Inc. appeals the July 20, 2005 decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Kaplan, J.), granting the motion for summary judgment of New York City (“City”) and dismissing LAM’s claims challenging, on primarily constitutional grounds, the City’s regulations requiring the licensing of tow trucks (“licensing regulations”), see NYC Admin. Code § 20-496. LAM’s federal challenge to the licensing regulations follows its two (unsuccessful) state court challenges seeking to prevent enforcement of the regulations. We assume the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Colon v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Manigaulte v. C.W. Post of Long Island UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Brant Smith v. Ned Lamont, in his official capacity as the Governor of the State of Connecticut; William Tong, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Connecticut; Bryan T. Cafferelli, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Consumer ProtectionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026