Legal Opinion

Nash v. Frank

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 9, 1999No. 95-00459-CV; CA A100115PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Mother appeals from the trial court’s order giving father custody of their two children. Although mother filed a timely appeal, she did not file a transcript of the hearing. After providing mother with notice, we dismissed mother’s appeal because no transcript had been filed. Mother wrote to the court explaining that she was not able to pay for a transcript. We vacated our order of dismissal, reinstated mother’s appeal, and “allowed this case to proceed without benefit of a transcript.” 1

On appeal, mother’s brief challenges primarily, if not exclusively, the trial court’s factual findings.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. York v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Marriage of Van WinkleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API