Legal Opinion

Bruce S. Wright and Louise K. Wright v. Cummins Inc., et al

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 31, 2025No. 1:23-cv-10496Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS _______________________________________ ) BRUCE S. WRIGHT and ) LOUISE K. WRIGHT, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 23-cv-10496-MJJ ) CUMMINS INC., et al, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________) MEMORANDUM OF DECISION October 31, 2025 JOUN, D.J. This case involves personal injuries allegedly sustained due to asbestos exposure. The complaint names forty-eight defendants and raises eight claims. See generally [Doc. No. 1]. Husband and wife plaintiffs Bruce Wright (“Mr. Wright”) and Louise Wright (“Mrs. Wright”)…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. Ahmed v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  3. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Woodward v. Emulex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  5. O'CONNOR v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API