Legal Opinion

McIlvaine v. Steinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1903Published

Appeal by the defendants, The Board of Education of the .City of New York and others, from an order of theSupreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 21st day of May, 1903, denying the said defendants’ motion for an order declaring that as to them the defendant Steinson had waived his right to appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Hatch, J.:

The action herein was instituted by plaintiff as surviving member of the firm of Townsend & Mcllvaine, attorneys at law, to foreclose a lien on certain moneys in the hands of the comptroller, which' were the proceeds of a certain judgment which the defendant Stein-son had recovered against the board of education. By a judgment duly entered herein a lien was established thereon in favor of the plaintiff and one Hart, another attorney, and from such judgment the defendant has duly appealed. Pursuant to an order, the board of education paid over the amount of the judgment against it to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brush v. Blot.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API