Legal Opinion

Heath's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1926No. Appeal, 184PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,

Appellant’s statement of question involved is as follows : “Have the children of testator a vested remainder where a will provides ‘I give devise and bequeath all the rest residue and remainder of my estate real personal and mixed, to my beloved wife Matilda Heath for and during the term of her widowhood, or as long as she shall remain my widow and at the termination of her widowhood either by marriage or death, I give devise and bequeath the same to my children then living & their heirs forever — and if there should be a child or children of any of my…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carstensen's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  2. Groninger's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Fox's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  4. Mulliken v. EarnshawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  5. Manderson v. LukensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Elkins' EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Metzgar EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Troxell's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Laughlin EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Donaldson's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Washington County · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API