Church & Dwight Co. v. SPD Swiss Precision Diagnostics
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:
The present motion in limine asks the Court to decide whether the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), 21 U.S.C. § 360c, bars certain false advertising claims brought under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). More accurately, the question is whether the FDCA bars Lan-ham Act false advertising claims relating to medical devices if the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) pre-approved the medical device’s labeling. The Court answered this question in the negative at the motion to dismiss stage, but it indicated that a different result…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Setser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Genus Lifesciences Inc. v. Lannett Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2018
- Exela Pharma Sciences, LLC v. Sandoz, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020
- Maroney v. Woodstream CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Novo Nordisk A/S and Novo Nordisk Inc. v. Zealthy Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.