Legal Opinion

Munroe v. Fette

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 20, 1905No. 17PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

Without noticing the many other assignments of error raised by the bill of exceptions, and on considera^ tion of which the court granted a new trial, it is sufficient upon this appeal to call attention to instruction No. 10, which reads as follows: “ You are instructed that if you find that certain of the property in question was held by Mrs. Stella Mun-roe under the lease from Barker Brothers with the privilege of purchasing the same, and that defendants furnished money as a part of the purchase price of said property described in the complaint to pay the balance to be paid thereon to said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. RouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Blen v. Bear River & Auburn Water & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Laack v. DimmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Estate of FletcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Allen v. San Francisco Wholesale Dairy Produce ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Herman v. Seaworld Parks & Entertainment, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
  5. Magnolia Park National Bank v. Banks, Huntley & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API