Legal Opinion

Connelly v. Hamilton Nat. Bank

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mb,. Justice Chambliss

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is another of numerous recent cases involving a dispute as to the coverage of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938; 29 U. S. C. A., section 201 et seq. Plaintiff below, Connelly, declares himself to be an employee of the defendant Bank in the capacity of “engineer an,d fireman of the furnace and boiler” of an office building occupied in part by the defendant in the conduct of its banking business and with numerous offices rented to various tenants, 25 per cent of whom are engaged in commerce, or in the production of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Brenizer v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis RailwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Stoike v. First National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. S.H. Robinson Co., Inc. v. LarueTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Brandell v. Continental Illinois Nat. Bank & Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jemerson v. Mercantile National Bank at DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  2. Smith v. Linden StationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API