Legal Opinion

McNabb v. Department of Motor Vehicles

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 24, 1993No. F018748PublishedCited by 2 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARDAIZ, J.

The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), pursuant to Vehicle Code section 13353.2, issued an order suspending the driver’s license of Glen McNabb on the grounds that he had driven with a blood-alcohol concentration greater than .08 percent. 1 McNabb challenged the order at a DMV administrative hearing. The hearing officer determined that the evidence supported the order and upheld the suspension. McNabb thereafter petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandate directing the DMV to set aside its order. The writ was granted, and DMV appeals. We will reverse and remand.

Factua…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Merced Mutual Insurance v. MendezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Royal Globe Insurance v. WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Rodriguez v. SolisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. People v. AshleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Campbell v. ZolinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Selma Auto Mall II v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API