Legal Opinion

Fulop v. Sea Gate Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 3, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, for injunctive relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated July 14, 1993, as granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The decision to grant a preliminary injunction is a matter ordinarily committed to the sound discretion of the court hearing the motion (see, Doe v Axelrod, 73 NY2d 748). To obtain a preliminary injunction a movant must demonstrate (1) a likelihood of ultimate success on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doe v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Jurlique, Inc. v. Austral Biolab Pty., Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Betesh v. JemalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fulop v. Sea Gate Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Kam Hampton I Realty Corp. v. Travertine Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API