Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 24, 1966No. 1 CA-IC 32PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Chief Judge.

This opinion relates to a claim for industrial compensation arising out of an automobile accident which occurred in Arizona while the employee was engaged in interstate travel between job locations. Compensation was denied based upon an asserted abandonment of employment due to a material deviation from a reasonably direct route of travel.

The petitioner Ercell Bailey is a resident of Indiana. The respondent Gardner Construction Company, Inc., is Bailey’s employer and has its headquarters in Indiana. The respondent, The Travelers Insurance Company, is a private carrier…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hale's Estate v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Narramore v. Fannin's Gas & Equipment CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Charles v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. Edwards v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Naylor v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  2. Talley v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  3. Noblitt v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  4. Kasprowiz v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Kasprowiz v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API