Bailey v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
STEVENS, Chief Judge.
This opinion relates to a claim for industrial compensation arising out of an automobile accident which occurred in Arizona while the employee was engaged in interstate travel between job locations. Compensation was denied based upon an asserted abandonment of employment due to a material deviation from a reasonably direct route of travel.
The petitioner Ercell Bailey is a resident of Indiana. The respondent Gardner Construction Company, Inc., is Bailey’s employer and has its headquarters in Indiana. The respondent, The Travelers Insurance Company, is a private carrier…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hale's Estate v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Narramore v. Fannin's Gas & Equipment CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Charles v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Edwards v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Naylor v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by5 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Talley v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Noblitt v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Kasprowiz v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Kasprowiz v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971