Legal Opinion

Unsel v. Meier

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1998No. 21489PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHRUM, Judge.

In this partition lawsuit, Appellants charge that the trial court erred in deciding the present ownership of entañed and fee interests in certain real estate.

Questions about ownership interests arose because Vivian Hart Unsel (Vivian) adopted her niece, Judith Hart Daniels (Judith). Vivian owned an entaüed interest in the subject land but had no children or other lineal descendants until the adoption. Four years after the adoption, Vivian died. But for the adoption, Vivian’s death would have vested Appellants and Lena Hart Hampton (Lena) with the remainder interest in the tracts…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  2. Wailes v. Curators of Central CollegeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  3. Davidson v. ToddSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. In Re Benner's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Mississippi Valley Trust Co. v. PalmsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harmon v. GoodwinDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API