Padgett v. Hatton
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Presiding Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) 1. “If two clauses in a deed are utterly inconsistent, the former shall prevail; but the intention of the parties, from the whole instrument, should, if possible, be ascertained and carried into effect.” Code, § 29-109.
2. Giving effect to each of the quoted provisions of the deed, it must be taken to mean that the grantor, after reserving a life estate for himself and wife, conveyed a succeeding life estate to “E,” with remainder over at her death to the heirs of her body, if any, in fee simple; but that, if “E” should die…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Sumpter v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Crawley v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Olmstead v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Kollock v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Matter of Estate of BloughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Britt v. FincherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Folsom v. RowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Hill v. LangSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Owens v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.