Legal Opinion

Padgett v. Hatton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 8, 1946No. 15363PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) 1. “If two clauses in a deed are utterly inconsistent, the former shall prevail; but the intention of the parties, from the whole instrument, should, if possible, be ascertained and carried into effect.” Code, § 29-109.

2. Giving effect to each of the quoted provisions of the deed, it must be taken to mean that the grantor, after reserving a life estate for himself and wife, conveyed a succeeding life estate to “E,” with remainder over at her death to the heirs of her body, if any, in fee simple; but that, if “E” should die…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Sumpter v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Crawley v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Olmstead v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  5. Kollock v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of BloughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Britt v. FincherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  3. Folsom v. RowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  4. Hill v. LangSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  5. Owens v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API