Hart Properties, Inc. v. Garfield
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The defendant-employer appeals from a judgment entered against it on a jury verdict for the plaintiff in an action for breach of an employment contract. Contrary to the appellant’s contentions, we find no error either in the trial court’s rulings in excluding proffered evidence, Perper v. Edell, 44 So.2d 78 (Fla.1949); Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Ganey, 125 So.2d 576, 578-579 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960); in the jury instructions, see Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Shouse, 83 Fla. 156, 91 So. 90, 99 (1922); DeBold v. Ocean Reef Club, Inc., 368 So.2d 95 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (Case no. 78-1073, opinion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Helman v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. ShouseSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. GaneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Perper v. EdellSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
- McCutcheon v. National Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.