Legal Opinion

Louisville N. R. Co. v. A. N. Chappell Co.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 1926No. 6 Div. 865Published

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant, as delivering carrier of an interstate shipment, sued to recover an amount due as an undercharge on a shipment of freight.

It is true that the federal statutes control in litigation of this kind. But as said in Sou. Ry. Co. v. Harrison, 119 Ala. 539,24 So. 552, 43 L.R.A. 385, 72 Am. St. Rep. 936:

"Unless the national law has been constructed by the Supreme Court of the United States, the courts of the various states will follow their own judgment in determining its effect on the contract."

We have been cited to no case, and know of none, decided by the Supreme Court of the United…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Southern Ferro Concrete Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Cornelius & Co. v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Creighton v. Air Nitrates CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API