Legal Opinion

In Re Baker

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 1990No. 88-223Published

1Opinion of the Court

579 A.2d 676 (1990)

In re Robert BAKER, Petitioner.

No. 88-223.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued June 21, 1990.

Decided August 14, 1990.

David B. Isbell, with whom Thomas S. Williamson, Jr. and David J. Bederman, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, appointed by the court as amici curiae, for petitioner.

Charles L. Reischel, Washington, D.C., for respondent, Committee on Admissions.

Before NEWMAN, FERREN and TERRY, Associate Judges.

NEWMAN, Associate Judge:

Robert Baker applied for admission to the Bar of the District of Columbia on December 2, 1985, pursuant to Rule 46(c)(3)(i) of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API