Zerillo v. Dyksterhouse
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
Plaintiffs’ complaint alleging conversion and defendants’ countercomplaint for specific performance were consolidated for trial. Because plaintiffs’ attorney failed to appear on the date that the trial was scheduled to begin, the court entered orders dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint with prejudice and granting a default judgment to defendants on the countercomplaint. The court also awarded defendants almost $7,000 in mediation sanctions. Plaintiffs now appeal as of right. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
The trial originally was scheduled to be conducted by Judge Richard M.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Krueger EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Muscio v. MuscioMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Woods v. MurdockMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by4 opinions
- John Pugno v. Blue Harvest Farms LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Laretha Gordon-WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Michigan Elevator LLC v. Matrix Detroit LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- Nicholas James Russian v. Shelley PorterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018