Legal Opinion
Keuroglian v. Wilkins
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 7, 1952No. 1198PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Chief Judge.
The question before us- is whether a tenant at sufferance who vacated an apartment without first giving his landlords. a written 30-day notice of his intention to quit should toe required to pay rent for more than the period which, -would have been covered by such notice.
This litigation was commenced wh'eri the tenant sued the landlords for statutory overcharges of rent covering a 25-month period. That claim was decided in favor of tenant and is not involved on this appeal. 1
As a separate defense the landlords filed a counterclaim charging that the tenant vacated the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Zoby v. KosmadakesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Miller v. PlumleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Dorado v. Loew's, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
3Cited by7 opinions
- Williams v. Tencher-Walker, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Thomas D. Walsh, Inc. v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
- Double H Housing Corp. v. DavidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Arthur Willis v. Retail Adjustment Bureau, Inc., Assignee of Jeffrey Garden ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Elliott v. CrawfordDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.