Legal Opinion

Brunstein v. City of Fort Collins

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1912No. 7263PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Brror to Bctrimer District Court. — Hon. Harry P. GambeE, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill

The plaintiff, in error, -who. was the plaintiff below, instituted this action fori the purpose of restraining the officers of the city of Port Collins from attempting to enforce the provisions of an ordinance of- that city, pertaining ■ to soliciting and receiving orders for intoxicating liquors. The substance of his complaint necessary to consider is, that he has been engaged in soliciting and receiving of persons within the city of Port Collins, orders for spirituous and fermented liquors of all kinds, and has been and. now is so engág-ed as agent and employee of certain persons of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Denver v. BeedeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  2. Olympic Athletic Club v. SpeerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901
  3. Brunstein v. People ex rel. Town of WindsorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  4. Colorado Athletic Ass'n v. SpeerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Colorado State Board of Examiners of Architects v. RicoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  2. Farmers' Dairy League, Inc. v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  3. Chamley v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  4. COLORADO STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF ARCH. v. RicoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  5. City & County of Denver v. GibsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API