Voght v. Galloway
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ADKINS, Justice.
By petition for writ of certiorari, we have for review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (280 So. 2d 529), which allegedly conflicts with a prior decision of this Court (Hume v. G. L. Miller Bond & Mortgage Co., 96 Fla. 337, 118 So. 3 (1928)), and with a prior decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District (F. A. Chastain Construction, Inc. v. Pratt, 146 So.2d 910 (Fla.App.3d, 1962)), on the same point of law. We have determined that we have jurisdiction pursuant to Fla.Const. art. V, § 3(b)(3), F.S.A.
The present cause arose from an action…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- FA Chastain Construction, Inc. v. PrattDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Hume v. G. L. Miller Bond & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1928
3Cited by1 opinion
- Centrust Savings Bank v. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997