Legal Opinion

Burditt v. Howth

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1876PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error from "Washington. Tried below before the Hon. I. B. McFarland. April 3,1865, Mary A. Howth sued J. A. & M. 0. Burditt, and alleged that the “defendants are justly indebted to the petitioner upon two promissory notes, executed by defendants and delivered to your petitioner, both dated the 30th day of November, 1863, and due January 1, 1865; one for the sum of $850, and the other for the sum of $550, with interest at ten per cent, from January 1,1865; ” * * "* “that…

Read the full summary

Error from "Washington. Tried below before the Hon. I. B. McFarland. April 3,1865, Mary A. Howth sued J. A. & M. 0. Burditt, and alleged that the “defendants are justly indebted to the petitioner upon two promissory notes, executed by defendants and delivered to your petitioner, both dated the 30th day of November, 1863, and due January 1, 1865; one for the sum of $850, and the other for the sum of $550, with interest at ten per cent, from January 1,1865; ” * * "* “that defendants neglect and refuse to pay the same.” • Attachment was sued out and levied. No service of citation appears to have…

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Associate Justice.

-The record does not show that any citation was ever issued to or served upon either of *471the original defendants. It is, however, insisted hy appellee that, as the judgment recited that all the defendants were duly served with process, the fact of service cannot he controverted, but must he presumed. In support of this proposition we are cited to the case of Curry v. York, 3 Tex., 357. But this ease has no application to a question such as is here presented. It merely holds thafi in the absence of a statement of facts, it will be presumed that the evidence was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blossman v. LetchfordTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Curry v. YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1848

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Flynt v. City of KingsvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Fitch v. BoyerTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Brazzel v. MurrayTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Miller v. First State Bank & Trust Co. of Santa AnnaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Carlton v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API