Legal Opinion

Potts v. City of Hugo

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 15, 1987No. C3-87-1232PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Appellant Arthur Potts brought a declaratory judgment action against respondents Gene and Lisa Sampson and the City of Hugo. The court determined that the zoning and parking ordinances of Hugo’s city code and the Hardwood Creek Estates’ restrictive covenants do not prohibit the Sampsons from parking their semi-truck and trailer at their home. Potts appeals from the judgment entered pursuant to the trial court’s judgment in the Sampsons’ favor. We reverse.

FACTS

The Sampsons live in a single-family dwelling in the Hardwood Creek Estates subdivision of the city of Hugo. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Galliford v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Town of Alta v. Ben Hame Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  2. St. Louis County v. TaggertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. County of Twin Falls v. HettingaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Town of Alta v. Ben Hame Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API