Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank v. Hebert
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 28, 1927No. 28439PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.
This is the aftermath of our decision in First National Bank v. Hebert, 162 La. 703, 111 So. 66 (decided November 29, 1926).
I
Relator’s (defendant’s) property was seized by tbe sheriff, and sold under executory process (foreclosure proceedings). The property was bid in by the bank, and sold by it to one Dartez.
When the bank and Dartez attempted to take possession of the property, relator filed a suit to annul the sale on the ground that the bank and Dartez had (in contemplation of law) colluded to suppress bidding at the sheriff’s sale, and he prayed that the sheriff be enjoined from executing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ouachita Nat. Bank v. Shell Beach Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- T. Hofman-Olsen, Inc. v. Northern Lumber Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- First Nat. Bank v. HebertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Board of Com'rs of Petite Anse Drainage Dist. v. Iberia & Vermilion R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
3Cited by4 opinions
- Unity Industrial Life Ins. Co. v. DejoieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Succession of LevinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- First Nat. Bank v. HebertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
- State ex rel. Truxillo v. GilbertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930