Legal Opinion

Carroll v. County of Putnam

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 3, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Putnam County Department of Highways & Facilities, dated August 28, 1998, which, after a hearing, found that the petitioner was not physically or mentally fit to perform his *444duties and placed him on an involuntary leave of absence, the petitioner appeals from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Braatz, J.), dated February 3, 1999, as granted that branch of the respondent’s motion which was to dismiss the fifth cause of action based on Executive Law § 296 for failure to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lahey v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Duso v. KralikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Reape v. GunnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Romano v. Town Board of ColonieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Glinka v. Town of PoughkeepsieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Virgilio v. New York State Office of Mental HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API