Legal Opinion · Dissent

Allied Fidelity Insurance Co. v. Environmental Quality Council

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1988No. 86-259Published

1DissentThomas, Justice

I experience a two-fold disappointment in the opinion of the court in this case. First, I am disappointed by the necessity to assume that Allied Fidelity Insurance Company (Allied) is a subrogee, when the facts are contrary. Secondly, I am disappointed by the attempt of the majority to apply the law of subrogation to these facts. This creative jurisprudence might be understandable if there were some valid goal accomplished. I see none.

The majority quite correctly recognizes that the doctrine of legal subrogation is being expanded. It is expanded in much the same way that the vintage aircraft…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brasel & Sims Construction Co. v. State Highway Commission of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. PostinWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Martin v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Olin Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Bank v. . LovenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API