Concord Watch Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
LawkeNoe, Judge:
Plaintiff imported certain complete desk or table watches. The watch movements were classified for duty at appropriate rates pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 367 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. §1001, par. 367 (a)), as modified by the trade agreement between the United States and Switzerland, effective February 15, 1936 (69 Treas. Dec. 74, T. D. 48093). The classification of the movements is not challenged by plaintiff, the whole controversy being related solely to the proper classification of the remaining portion of the articles.
Yarious exhibits were…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
3Cited by7 opinions
- Squibb v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Berg Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- Concord Watch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
- Concord Watch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Concord Watch Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.