Legal Opinion

Concord Watch Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 20, 1951No. C. D. 1348PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LawkeNoe, Judge:

Plaintiff imported certain complete desk or table watches. The watch movements were classified for duty at appropriate rates pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 367 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. §1001, par. 367 (a)), as modified by the trade agreement between the United States and Switzerland, effective February 15, 1936 (69 Treas. Dec. 74, T. D. 48093). The classification of the movements is not challenged by plaintiff, the whole controversy being related solely to the proper classification of the remaining portion of the articles.

Yarious exhibits were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Squibb v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. Berg Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Concord Watch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  4. Concord Watch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  5. Concord Watch Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API