Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chevy Chase Land Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 29, 1999No. Misc. No. 24, Sept. Term, 1998Published

1DissentCathell, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the portion of the majority’s opinion holding that the railroad line at issue was not abandoned under Maryland property law.

The Court reaches its conclusion on the abandonment issue by answering a question not certified to us by the federal court—the effect of federal law on the purported abandonment. In doing so, the majority seeks to answer the ultimate question before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Our task was to answer the third certified question based on Maryland law: “If the deed conveyed an easement ..., has that easement, as a…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Preseault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  3. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Matthews v. Amberwood Associates Ltd. Partnership, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Vogler v. GeissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API