Ford New Holland, Inc. v. Proctor-Russell Tractor Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
INGRAM, Justice.
Proctor-Russell Tractor Company, Inc. (hereinafter “Proctor-Russell”), sued Ford New Holland, Inc. (hereinafter “Ford”), alleging fraud and breach of contract. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Proctor-Russell on the fraud claim and awarded it $65,-000 in compensatory damages and $200,000 in punitive damages. Ford appeals, arguing, inter alia, that the evidence presented by Proctor-Russell was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict in its favor and, therefore, that the trial court erred in denying Ford’s motion for J.N.O.V.
A motion for J.N.O.V. is to be granted only…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Corry v. Sylvia y CiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Soniat v. Johnson-Rast & HaysSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Sheridan Drive-In, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Smith v. MBL Life Assur. Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Hollis v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McGriff v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Linda Prentice, etc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 2022
- SLF Holdings, LLC v. Uniti Fiber Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020