Legal Opinion

Ford New Holland, Inc. v. Proctor-Russell Tractor Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 29, 1993No. 1920543PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INGRAM, Justice.

Proctor-Russell Tractor Company, Inc. (hereinafter “Proctor-Russell”), sued Ford New Holland, Inc. (hereinafter “Ford”), alleging fraud and breach of contract. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Proctor-Russell on the fraud claim and awarded it $65,-000 in compensatory damages and $200,000 in punitive damages. Ford appeals, arguing, inter alia, that the evidence presented by Proctor-Russell was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict in its favor and, therefore, that the trial court erred in denying Ford’s motion for J.N.O.V.

A motion for J.N.O.V. is to be granted only…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Corry v. Sylvia y CiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Soniat v. Johnson-Rast & HaysSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Sheridan Drive-In, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  4. Smith v. MBL Life Assur. Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Hollis v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGriff v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Linda Prentice, etc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 2022
  3. SLF Holdings, LLC v. Uniti Fiber Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API