Legal Opinion
Heyman v. Bishop
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 11, 1951PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
15 N.J. Super. 266 (1951)
83 A.2d 344
ERNEST F. HEYMAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JACOB BISHOP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued July 9, 1951.
Decided September 11, 1951.
Before Judges COLIE, GRIMSHAW and HARTSHORNE.
Mr. Howard K. Stokes (Messrs. Wise & Wise, attorneys) argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. David Goldstein (Messrs. Goldstein & Novogrod, attorneys) argued the cause for respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by COLIE, J.S.C.
The plaintiff, Ernest F. Heyman, instituted a suit in the Monmouth County District Court seeking a declaratory…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sheild v. WelchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Wolk v. WidlanskyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
- Trust Co. of New Jersey v. DohertySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
3Cited by6 opinions
- SDG v. Inventory Control Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Housing Auth., Atlantic City v. CoppockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- JMJ PROPERTIES v. KhuzamNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Newark Park Plaza Associates Ltd. v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Frontenac Associates v. FauerbachNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.