Legal Opinion

Begley v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 4, 1929PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, C. J.

'Cecil Begley prosecutes this appeal to reverse a judgment of conviction against him for assault with intent to rape.

It is first earnestly insisted that the evidence is not legally sufficient to- support the verdict. While the defendant took the stand in his own 'behalf and expressly denied that he had attempted to have intercourse with the prosecuting witness against her consent, and while he was corroborated in this respect by a male companion who was with him, yet, in testing the legal sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, we must view the evidence for the State in the light…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. Lockett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Paxton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  4. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  5. Snetzer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gerlach v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  3. Territory of Hawaii v. NoguchiHawaii Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. Boyett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API